Sunday, December 28, 2014

How Many Things Do You Want To Suck At?

A few years ago I heard Greg Mele of the Chicago Swordplay Guild say something that's stuck with me, "How many things do you want to suck at?" This wasn't a personal attack of any kind, but rather an honest question, and a warning. The field of Historical European Martial Arts is massive, with sources as early as the 1300s, from all parts of the continent: Medieval, renaissance, and classical; Italian, German, French, Spanish, English, Dutch, and more, I'm sure, that I know nothing about. Sometimes manuals fill out each other's gaps, sometimes they directly contradict each other. Cuts are favoured in some, thrusts in others, longer swords, shorter swords, staff weapons, etc.

It's kind of like a drug, the kind of drug that any martial artist is familiar with. You start to figure one system out, and, just as it starts to feel like you're doing the same old thing again and again, you notice a shiny new thing to check out and, hey! This new thing is pretty close to the old thing, but because I've got a bit of experience I can pick it up easier. Hey, and it expresses some new ideas that make a lot of sense! They make more sense than the first one did, that's for sure. Oh, but wait, there's another one over here...

At the school I teach at there are a number of different classes you can take, most of them based in the same theory, but with idiosyncratic differences from weapon to weapon: rapier, longsword (both on foot and mounted), polearms (on foot and mounted), and sidesword, not to mention grappling (also on foot and mounted). Outside of the core, single-system weapons we've also got Bartitsu (which itself consists of different disciplines, to some extent), stage combat, and archery (on foot and mounted). That's, what, up to a dozen different things to work on? Fifteen, if you count the components of Bartitsu separate things. It's a veritable feast of choice, but I highly recommend against doing everything at once, unless you want to have a really frustrating experience.

The biggest issue is time, and skill acquisition. It's hard to learn new things, and once a week, to be frank, doesn't cut it for most people. Generally, once a week is just long enough for you body to have forgotten what it learned the previous week. For someone who's relatively new, twice a week is pretty good for starting out, but to really get things down you should really be working on it three or four times a week. And, yes, those should be sessions with an instructor, for at least an hour. It's good to practice the basics on your own, but it's not good to practice the wrong thing, or the right thing in the wrong way. When you're starting out your practice time should be spent learning the viscera of whatever you're doing: get the terminology down, and classes become much easier. That means 1-2 hours of class time, 2-4 times per week. If you're splitting that time up between all of the above (rapier, longsword, and bartitsu, say) you just aren't going to learn them nearly as fast as if you dedicated the same amount of time to each of them in turn.

The good news is that once you've got the basic skill set down pat, it's relatively easy to maintain that skill. Get yourself up to an intermediate/advanced level with something, and weekly sessions are often enough to keep the better part of the rust off. Let too much time elapse without training, however, and you'll be amazed at how much your limbs have forgotten how to do. This means that diversifying is okay, as long as you're building a solid base in each area before moving on to other things. And the closer the theory of each of the systems are to each other, the easier it is to learn and transfer skill between them: Learning Fiore's dagger, longsword, and wrestling works together, because they all share commonalities and build on each other.

There's so much information out there, and it's very tempting to learn everything. But, and this is the hardest part for me, it's also so easy to drop something once it starts getting difficult. Sticking to something for the long haul is sometimes the only way to really find out what it has to offer.

Final anecdote: I see a lot of guys doing amazingly well at the HEMA thing, some of whom are out and teaching classes and being hailed as experts with as few as two years of study of the subject. The other day I had a kendo guy come in to the store, and we were talking a bit about swordplay. When I asked him what he thought of it he said, "Well, I'm just getting started; I've only been doing it for five years."

Monday, November 24, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Full Course Review

Overview

During the week of November 10th, Academie Duello offered a five-day course on the living art of Jogo do Pau, a stickfighting tradition from Portugal that has its roots in the swordplay practices of medieval European battlefields. The course was taught by the internationally recognized instructor, author, and coach Luis Preto, and ran 10am to 4pm Monday through Friday, with an hour-long lunch break each day. As an add-on, some of us also signed up for additional instruction for a coaching certificate. This came in the form of an extra thirty-minute lecture each day, and an exam following the course to see how much we'd retained.

I've already put down my initial thoughts on each of the first five days (which you can see here). This is my one-week-later review on the whole event: Content, presentation, format, and so on.

The Art - Jogo do Pau

I've heard that the Spanish tend to play sports gently, whether soccer, or jugger, or anything else. The same cannot be said of the Portuguese: Jogo do pau is fast, hard, and unforgiving. The name "Jogo do pau" means "Staff game," and it's primary weapon is a five-foot staff made of a robust but flexible hardwood (Luis said it was lotus). The staff is thicker on one end, and held by the thinner end to deliver more powerful blows.

Because jogo do pau uses the staff, and not a bladed weapon, the art is focussed on delivering rotational blows to deliver maximum force at the point of impact. Because it is a defensive art (i.e. focussed on surviving an encounter with someone trying to injure you), and because it has strong foundation in outnumbered combat, there is a strong emphasis on breaking hands and knees, and anything else that happens to be within reach.

For a full accounting of jogo do pau, some of its history, and a thorough accounting of its techniques and strategy, I highly recommend checking out Luis' books and DVDs, and his youtube channel.

One of the main perks of working with a living tradition, as opposed to trying to reconstruct arts from books, is having someone to correct all of those little mistakes you don't even know you're making. Right from the get-go Luis was clear about which techniques worked and which ones didn't. He was particularly clear about which techniques were better at full speed, and which ones only seemed to work, and only at slower speeds.

We spent the bulk of our time working on one-on-one techniques, but also covered some two-on-one techniques. By the end of the course, I felt like everyone had a thorough understanding of the mechanics of one-on-one combat with the staff, and we all had the tools to develop outnumbered combat more thoroughly with a bit of reading and practice. We didn't go over any of the baton (short stick) material, though I`m sure there`s plenty of it to go over at higher levels of study.

The Coach - Luis Preto

It takes a lot of planning, experience, and insight to run a twenty-five hour intensive course without either burning out the students or covering so much material that it cannot be retained. Fortunately, Luis Preto hasn't only been practicing jogo do pau for almost two decades, but it's clear that he's been practicing it at a very high level and putting a lot of thought into the best way to pass it on to other people. His postgraduate training in sports training methodologies and coaching sciences definitely showed, in particular during the coaching certificate add-on.

The material of the course was carefully structured around developing perception skills, with a focus on distance management and reinforcing the key principles of day one: Defense is more important than offense, distance is the best defense, and always keep an eye out for easy targets (thrusting someone who attacks from too close, and striking hands and/or knees if they're left unprotected). Each day carefully reviewed the material of the day(s) before, and adding new material in a way that easily integrated it into what we'd already learned.

If you're ever presented with the opportunity to train with Luis, I highly recommend it.

The Format - Week-long intensive

Twenty-five hours is a lot of work, especially when a significant portion of that is working at full(ish) speed and (mostly) maximum intensity. By the end of the week, I suspect that everyone knew which muscles they hadn't used before, and which muscles they hadn't stretched enough. I know that there were muscles in my inner thigh that I spent the weekend stretching and working loose again.

Over the course of the week we covered a LOT of material, but I'm fully aware that there could have been more. We only did relatively little multiple opponents stuff (only...two or three hours?), and we didn't do any baton (short stick) material. I don't think most of us could have taken much more than five hours a day, but I think a second week would have been manageable. At least in terms of training; in terms of taking-time-off-work I think two weeks would be significantly more difficult to fit in. 

On reflection, one of the biggest perks to having that much time dedicated to training was that we were able to give each concept the time that it needed to be fully explored and developed. If something needed two hours we could work on it for two hours and still have the time to put it in context and integrate it into freeplay. 

The Add-On - Jogo do Pau Coaching Certificate

At the end of each day, those of us who'd signed up for the coaching certificate were given a lecture that was supposed to be half an hour, but, due to technical issues and tangents, usually ran forty-five minutes to an hour (though nobody complained). Each day we went over the theory a different aspect of coaching: Teaching Fundamentals, Physical Conditioning, Managing Practices, the Perception-Action approach to teaching, and Tactics (including sparring guidelines). Lectures were accompanied by powerpoint slides which efficiently laid out the topics covered. 

The coaching lectures were very helpful, even just in terms of putting the rest of the day into context. Most of what we covered in the coaching classes followed the contents of Luis' books, particularly these two, but with room for questions and answers, and being backed up with the rest of the course, I found that it stuck a lot better.

Rather than wrapping up the course with a final exam, Luis opted for another day of lessons and Q&A. The final exams are being carried out over four weeks: every Friday Luis sends us a list of questions, and we have a week to supply answers. It's an interesting format, one that encourages longer-term engagement with the material, and thus greater retention.

(Final?) Thoughts

The whole course itself was a definite success. The instruction and fellow students were all top-notch, and the intensity of the art itself is something that I particularly enjoy. Finally getting the chance to learn from Luis in an extended setting is something that I've been hoping to do for a long time, and it's been everything I hoped for.

The entire course's strict focus on the primacy of defense allowed us to go the whole week with a minimum of protective equipment, while maintaining intensity and "speed honesty." The system as presented by Luis was pretty simple and straightforward, and everything we learned was geared towards combat efficacy.

Although this past week has (mostly) been a return to the same-old schedule, Luis' training methods have been rolling around in the back of my head pretty much non-stop, and have already changed the way I think about teaching and planning classes.

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Day Five Thoughts

Day Five Thoughts

Material Covered: Review and develop approaching parries, and why they aren't a good default. We added approaching parries against people that don't have the same dominant hand. The post-lunch section was full of material: we reviewed three classes of defences (exiting parries, avoidance by distance, and approaching parries), learned specific footwork for being trapped against a wall, learned one more technique for fighting against multiple opponents, and wrapped up by learning a super-cool spinning attack.

Initial Thoughts: It's all over! Somehow we managed to go all five days without any serious injuries. That said, there were a lot of knuckles rapped, and a few old knee injuries that were aggravated by well-placed strikes. Also, a number of us (myself include) found that there was a very special ache to the inside knee after a week of low stance and rapid direction changes.

There'll be a certain amount of mental digestion required before I really know what I've learned and what I want to do with all of the information. A lot of this is going to be incorporated in my practice of striking weapons (sidesword and longsword), and I'm definitely interested in keeping up the stickfighting skills. Whether or not it'll take the form of a smaller study group or a more formal class has yet to be seen, but with more than a dozen of us in the course it shouldn't be too hard to find a training partner, at least.

In the end, my body held up far better than I'd expected, in no small part, I don't doubt, to the strength training I've been doing for the last year and a half. There were moments of sometimes significant mental fatigue, but overall I was able to stay engaged and active the whole time (when I wasn't taping up replacement staffs). By the end of the week my body had mostly adapted to the high training volume, including the fairly high intensity that we maintained throughout each session (with the exception of the aforementioned sore knee, which I suspect requires just a bit of dedicated loosening/stretching until the tissues have had a chance to adapt to the new stresses). I am sorely tempted to figure out a way to get in five hours of training a day if at all possible.

Now to get to work on a bigger, beefier review of the whole thing, including Luis' teaching methods and a report on the coaching certification course that was also offered (which I, of course, signed up for as well).

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Day Four Thoughts

Day Four Thoughts

Material Covered: Rather than covering new material, the bulk of the day was spent on perception drills, building from attacks against the forehand side up to seven possible strikes (descending to head or knee, or ascending, all on both forehand and backhand sides, or vertical). Once we'd covered all of that, we got into some medium-speed freeplay, alternating blows and strikes. We learned some "knight" footwork approaching on the other side. The day ended with what Luís called "approaching parries," horizontal parries against descending strikes while closing distance to grapple.

Initial thoughts: Staff fighting is fun! Getting into freeplay was incredibly satisfying. I'm told that when Mike and I were paired together the hall was filled with the sound of staffs clacking and both of us giggling.

Today marked the start of the staffs dying. Jon's exploded, then Matheus broke his, and Dave broke two in a row. Fortunately we've got enough staffs lying about to replace the broken ones, and we've been taping them up right away to increase their longevity. The replacement staffs are just 1-1/4" dowelling, and it's noticeably heavier and more rigid than the tapered staffs. Both characteristics significantly change the handling of the weapons, but they do pretty well.

Hands and knees continue to get clipped, but I think we've still managed to keep the injuries down. Devon's thumb was particularly bothersome for him at one point after taking a hit from Matheus, but he seemed all right by the end of the day.

Tomorrow's the last day, then I'm ordering staves and books for the trainees. I want to find some way to keep up training jogo do pau, but I'm not sure where to fit it in to my schedule. I'm already involved in the wrestling and duelling sabre study groups, and I think that for this I'd like to organize something more formal than just a one-hour study group.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Day Three Thoughts

Day Three Thoughts

Material covered: Morning warm-up was reviewing the mechanics of footwork, followed by even more tweaking of parrying actions (at different distances), and adding the parry against a vertical strike. Tweaked distance management by adding half steps back against half rotational strikes. In the afternoon we started with what Mike called a feeder drill, with one partner giving the other cues for parries and a variety of pre-emptive strikes (changing guards or starting a strike in thrusting distance). Then we added an approach that dodges longer-measure thrusts, and the variety of strikes possible on that approach. We ended with a first look at exchanging blows and reading the staff's momentum the moment after a parry--both for the attacker pressing their attack, and for the defender counterattacking.

Initial thoughts: Once again quoting Jon, "It's starting to click." That might not be verbatim. With the introduction of the "exchange of blows" material, it's really beginning to feel like we're learning how to fight, and the first two days have served as an excellent foundation. Everyone's parries and strikes have vastly improved since day one. I know that I still have work to do on both accounts, but more often than not the staff alignment at the end of the parry is correct, and the other guy's weapon is getting enthusiastically knocked aside. Distance management is also improving, but still tricky as well. Especially working multiple parries.

Not sure what it was about today, but the second half went much faster than it did yesterday, when I spent the last hour or so looking at the clock wondering how only fifteen minutes could have gone by. I suspect that it's a combination of somewhat more complicated material (specific approaching footwork, parry, counter or press attack) and not doing any multiple-opponents stuff. That two against one stuff we did yesterday was very fun, but with fun comes a significant likeliness that I'll push myself pretty hard.

Having Mike as a partner is always a fun time. He's willing to play as hard as I am, as often as not, though we should probably save each other for the end of the day since we tend to build on each other's enthusiasm and the intensity quickly escalates.

It's difficult to really realize that we're two thirds of the way through the course. We've covered a lot of material, but it still feels like we've got weeks' worth of stuff that we could be going over. We've barely scratched the surface of the multiple opponents material, and we're only just getting into the meat of fighting.

As we get closer to getting into some more freeplay-oriented activities we're really going to find out the full extent to which we've internalized the basics. I suspect that by the end of tomorrow most of us will be nursing sore thumbs.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Day Two Thoughts

Day Two Thoughts

Material covered: review of day one material, add side and overhand parries on the backhand side, add basic multiple opponents material (clear and strike combos against downwards blows on both forehand and backhand side), add basic strategic concepts of setup (stance and distance), initial blow, and exchanging blows, with exploration of distance (striking distance and thrusting distance).

Initial thoughts: I really appreciate how streamlined the system that Luis teaches is, and it seems that that's largely due to the influence of his instructor (Nuno Curvello Russo?) who downplayed a lot of material that he had been taught that did not contribute to the effective performance of the art. As a result, we aren't focussing on the entirety of what is possible within the art, but on what in the art is effective. In a lot of ways it's quite the contrary of a lot of historical swordsmanship, especially when it's trying to use entire corpora of works.

We're recovering a lot of material, which is a good thing. "A, then A+B, then A+B+C, all the way to Z," as Luis said on day one. We've actually got pretty much all of the motions in the toolbox, I think. Now it's just a matter of stringing them together.

It's interesting watching the other students. Everyone's brain is melting at a different rate. Even with an hour-long break in the middle of things, five hours is a very long time to be physically active for most people. Even for those of us that do this daily, we don't tend to be training for five hours a day. Luis' occasional (rant) breaks are definitely refreshing and well-received.

Got commended for developing my parries this morning. The secret is to think of them as cross-checks, I think. At least, when I started thinking of them as cross-checks they started making more sense to me. And remembering the stretch reflex anteater/swan pose fixes a lot of mechanical problems when sequencing strikes. There's definitely a lot more to work on, both mechanically and strategically. I keep on finding myself trying to lift rising blows over my head, which is considerably more risky when you don't have a crossbar.

It's too bad that Luis didn't manage to bring more sticks with him. I'll need to figure out how to bring more in. Between that and running out of a number of Luis' books, I hope to have an order form together by Friday for all of the participants who want to order stuff in.

Teaching youth classes yesterday was particularly jarring. Everything I picked up (longsword, rapier) I wanted to treat like a JdP staff. Today was significantly better. The distinct differences in weight distribution between a staff and a sword really help to compartmentalize the accompanying mechanical actions and strategic considerations.

Open floor's going to be weird.

Monday, November 10, 2014

Jogo do Pau Intensive Course: Day One Thoughts

Day One Thoughts

Material covered: All forehand and backhand blows, basic distance management, side & overhead parries from a point-forward waiting guard.

Initial thoughts: Looks like my reaching out to the local stickfighting community worked. Most of the people signed up are AD folk, many of whom I hassled into submission. Of the four non-duello people signed up, one's a total newcomer (he's only done karate and bjj, so this is his first serious foray into weapon arts), one's our old friend Mike (he couldn't make day one, but he's fairly experienced so should be able to pick the rest up pretty quick), and the other two are local SE Asian stickfighters.

I feel for the new guy. The rest of us only have to repurpose our existing motor skills, he's got to learn a whole new set. It's very interesting to watch his learning curve though. Luis' environmental approach to teaching works really well. I don't know if the new guy realizes how much he's learning incidentally. His martial arts background also helps Luis correct him with a minimum of direction: it's not that he can't move his body the way it needs to move, he just doesn't know how (yet). As long as he doesn't get too overwhelmed I think this is going to be a great experience for him.

At the day's halfway point I was starting to feel a bit of tenderness in my hands, so I put on my gloves. I have a decent set of calluses on my hand from kettlebells and barbell work, but we've been swinging the stick around more than a lot. I suspect the guys that didn't heed the glove warning will not last the week with intact palms.

The day itself was an excellent start. Many many repetitions of basic strikes, many many repetitions of parries. Luis' approach is very natural, and flows intuitively. Sometimes too intuitively. "It really works," Jon said. "I don't always know how it works, but it really does. He just gives you one thing to do and all of a sudden it all comes together." Incorporating the stretch reflex into delivering blows really makes me think of the large duelling sabre molinelli, and they really improve the power of the blows. All of the weapon paths, along with Luis' mechanics, just make it so easy to blast into things with the stick. I've already nudged a few knuckles, mostly by accident, and I hope that we don't get any worse injuries than bruises.

I am fortunate. I have already read all of Luis' books, so the concepts are not new. I am fortunate as well for getting into strength training last year. Everyone was massaging shoulders and thighs when we were done, and I was just feeling gently spent. Just like the last time Luis was in town, it wasn't until towards the end of the day that I was really getting going. By Friday I'll really be having fun.

No idea what tomorrow's going to bring, but I imagine our parries will find their risposte.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

[Book Review] Mastering the Art of Arms, Vol. 2: The Medieval Longsword

In brief: a solid resource for the beginner swordsman, and a splendid example of a progressive curriculum for instructors of any level.

If you're looking for a general reference/guidebook for Italian medieval martial arts, this is not the book for you. Instead, this book is a guidebook for someone just getting started: a curriculum to work through, chapter by chapter, at the end of which you will have learned all of the basics: blows, stances, and tactics, all the way through swordplay to grappling and counter-grappling.

I found it particularly useful as an instructor, especially since Guy's spent years refining both his interpretations of the sources and his teaching method. There's a lot to learn about how to teach, how to structure a curriculum, and how to get students ready for freeplay, all cunningly disguised as straightforward, easily read and understood instructions.

As always, Guy's language is clear and precise, and contains no small amount of good humour.

Sunday, November 2, 2014

My Hands Are Not Invincible


A few years ago, Luis Preto was living in Vancouver, getting his Masters in Coaching Sciences at the University of British Columbia, and stopping by Academie Duello every week or so to get some practice time in with either myself or the school's director, Devon Boorman, or, as was frequently the case, with both of us. The weapons of choice were usually longswords, but he usually had a bag of staffs, which we'd pull out from time to time. He also had two sets of ActionFlex staffs that he'd had specially made that were fun to play with.

Training with Luis was always enlightening. His training paradigm tends towards full-force and minimal gear. More often than not we didn't wear any protective gear, not even masks, the result of which was that I quickly learned that my primary concern must be defence. Luis' precise sense of both distance and timing, and incredible speed all forced me to bring my top game to every drill and exercise, no matter how basic or complex. His low stance also allowed him to strike low targets that I was unaccustomed to defending, which brought me to develop defensive strategies to be able to keep all of my limbs protected or ready to evade.

One particularly memorable session started with the three of us working on parrying exercises for about an hour, at the end of which Devon had a meeting or some kind of important business with a deadline. Both Luis and I didn't have anything to do until much later in the day, so we decided to go all out with the ActionFlex staffs.* Since the weapons are padded, and the point of contact is quite flexible, we decided to forego any kind of protective equipment beyond mutually agreeing against thrusts to the face.

Boy, did I underestimate what I was getting myself into.

After half an hour, I was starting to figure out how to keep my hands safe. Imagine thirty minutes of having your hands very enthusiastically slapped by a towel-wielding ninja. Thirty minutes after that and I started to figure out how to protect my lead leg, which in turn led to another twenty to thirty minutes of being reminded that I needed to protect my hands. I did manage to land a few hits of my own, and there were a handful of very satisfying thrusts, but overall I think Luis belaboured me for the better part of an hour and a half, if not two hours.

It was marvellous.

It was marvellous, and I'm pretty sure that I learned more in that single two-hour period than in any other single training session before or after. I learned that, aside from one notably eye-watering exception, my ability to protect my head was pretty darn solid, likewise for my torso. I learned so much about how to move to keep my limbs safe. And upon reflection, I learned a lot from Luis about how to train someone without having to say anything. For every improvement that I managed to implement, Luis was able to push my limits, to make it better than it was. If I was able to deal with a particular hand shot, Luis changed his targets or approach and forced me to think strategically, rather than just technically.

By the end of the session my hands were pretty puffy from getting slapped around, and so was my left thigh. I still haven't really figured out how to keep my lead knee safe, but my hands are much safer than they were, and protecting the hands is now one of the first things I check for when getting students ready for sparring.

At this point it's been a few years since I last got to train with Luis. I'm definitely looking forward to spending a whole week with him.

*A quick note on padded weapons: They are kind of silly, yes, and definitely do not accurately reflect the dynamics of steel-on-steel contact, sure, but they do allow you to go all out without too much worry about damaging your partner, and although they don't necessarily match up to sword dynamics that well they are not that far off from a pair of sticks. Did I mention that they allow you to go all out? All of my most exhilarating training revelations have been in the discovery of training tools that allow me to express myself with gusto--Duelling sabre, anyone?

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Why do I train?

Why do I train? It's a pretty complicated question, and one that I don't think that I can answer right out. The question "why?" is also closely related to "what?" and "how?"

What is training?

The first thing to think about is what training is, and what it's supposed to accomplish. Mark Rippetoe, the author of Starting Strength, and a barbell coach with decades of experience, distinguishes between exercise and training, the former being done for immediate results, and the latter for results over time. Exercise is done because it feels good, and training is done because you want to get better at something. 

Almost everything I do I do for very short-term goals. I fence because it's fun, and I enjoy the chemical rush of adrenaline and endorphins. For the longest time, I only worked out for the social aspect of moving heavy objects with a fun group of people. But, since discovering Starting Strength in late 2012, I've started trying to think about my activities not just as fun things to do, but as a means to improve myself.

What do I train?

The human body is a highly adaptable machine, and those adaptations are governed by the principle of specificity: The human organism adapts itself to the specific stresses that it is subjected to. If you're going to start training for something, you'll need to think about what characteristics you're looking to improve. Here are a few:
  • Strength - The ability of your muscles to produce the maximum amount of force. This can be improved by increasing the quantity of muscle producing the force, by increasing the efficiency of each muscle's force-producing mechanism, or, most often, both.
  • Range of Motion - The ability of each joint to move functionally to its maximum extent. A lot of the time a restricted range of motion is a direct result of insufficient strength.
  • Recovery/Strength Endurance - How many repetitions can you perform of a strenuous action? How long do you need to rest between sets of repetitions? This is the core of conditioning training.
  • Technique - How well do you mechanically perform an action? Is it efficient, or are you moving in such a way that you're wasting energy?
  • Tactics - Can you identify which actions are the correct actions given the current set of stimuli? Is you defense the correct one, based on the attack you are receiving?
  • Strategy - How do you manoeuver your opponent into a position that's favourable to you? Of the many possible actions that could be considered correct, which one is the best for the current situation?

How do I train?

Each aspect listed above has a different method of training. Operating at the highest possible speed is not the best way to learn a technique, but it is required to fine-tune it. Swordfighting, contrary to what some people think, does not in itself make you stronger.

Likewise, you have to ask yourself how far you want to go with everything. How strong is strong enough? How much range of motion do you need in order to perform your tasks without injury? Does my mandritto fendente really need to be that perfect before I start fighting?

Want to get stronger? I mean, really, stronger? There's no substitute for barbells, especially for lower-body strength. There's a lot of gymnastics stuff out there that'll do wonders for your upper body, though, frequently in ways that just aren't possible with barbells.

How about conditioning? I like kettlebells. None of those goofy, million-variety moves, though. Just good old swings, snatches, cleans and presses, and maybe a turkish get up or twenty.

Technique, tactics, and strategy have the problem of being difficult to assess. Conditioning and strength are easy: how much weight is on the bar? How long did it take you to do 100 snatches? Unfortunately there's no easy assessment for combat performance, since there are so many variables. You can't measure your ability based on how easy it is for you to beat someone else in a fight unless you expect that person to stop training just so they can be a marker for you. Training to fight really requires a coach/instructor with a solid idea of what you should be capable of, who also has enough knowledge and experience to know the best way to get you there. For those instructors, sparring and drilling can be assessment mechanisms, but all the hard work of improving (the training itself) happens in drills.

Why do I train?

I train strength for the simple reason that I know I can be stronger.

I've gotten back into kettlebell training for the simple reason that I signed up for a certification workshop in the new year, and my conditioning isn't up to snuff, so I need to train to pass.

To be honest, right now I'm not training my swordplay at all. I'll fence from time to time because it's fun, and I teach because I like seeing other people get better, but I'm still looking for a reason to get better at swordplay that isn't just "I don't want to suck." I'll let you know if I find one.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

[Quote] General Advice Concerning Pedagogy

From Capt. Settimo Del Frate's 1872 textbook for Maestro Giuseppe Radaelli's school, translated by Christopher A. Holzman and available in full as "The Art of the Duelling Sabre," published by SKA Swordplay Books.

a) The better the student learns to balance the weight of his body in its various movements; the more he cultivates suppleness in his body; the stronger his sword arm is, the more smoothly and easily he will be able to progress in the study of fencing. It is therefore necessary to spend as much time in the gym as fencing. The two practices should alternate daily with a well-planned progression, without ever abusing the student's stamina.

b) Fencing must be taught individually; however, multiple students can simultaneously carry out the practice of basic movements that have already been taught individually.

c) In giving instruction, the Maestro must never be too verbose or philosophical. Every explanation must be clear, concise, and followed by the practical execution of the movement just explained. In addition, explanations must give the student the best mental picture of the action so that he can more easily imitate it.

d) At all times, the Maestro must carefully follow the progression of instruction and strive to adapt it in detail to students of different mental and physical attitudes.

e) The Maestro's energy and passion for teaching transfers to students; likewise, an instructor's lack of enthusiasm and apathy will engender indolence and discontent in the students. Any Maestro who does not thoroughly understand and bolster the mental and physical energy of fencing in his teaching will always be ineffective.

f) The movements of the student's blade are always a function of the Maestro's method of creating them. As a result, the line of the sword will.be more or less proper and strong, the attack longer or shorter, and more or less precise and fast. The parries will be more or less delayed, and the feint more or less energetic. The better or worse the explanation of the movements of the body, and the manner of correction employed by the Maestro, the better or worse the student's execution can be.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Joe Ladnier Interview

Starting Strength Series: Joe Ladnier: http://youtu.be/zxJ2Q6sNimw

I watched all three parts of Mark Rippetoe's interview with Joe Ladnier today and was thoroughly impressed. At this point I can barely fathom lifting the amount of weight that he talks about. Also, the existence of a powerlifting bodybuilder (bodybuilding powerlifter?) is mildly terrifying.

It inspires me to kick up the amount of weight I'm lifting. I know I'm no slouch, and I probably don't have half the genetic aptitude that Mr. Ladnier has, but I'm sure I still have a fair way to go.

Friday, May 2, 2014

New Toy

Made myself a new toy! That is indeed a bowling ball on a stick. I haven't weighed it, but I think the ball is ~14 pounds, with another couple of pounds for the steel pipe. It was really easy to put together, just drilled a hole in the ball and the threads on the pipe grabbed nicely.
Played around with it a goodly bit, too. It's pretty brutal.